UTILITY OF ULTRASOUND CRITERIA OF ROUNDNESS INDEX TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT CERVICAL LYMPHADENOPATHY
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of ultrasound criteria of Roundness Index (RI) to differentiate between benign and malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.
Methods: We evaluated 305 patients having clinically palpable enlarged cervical lymph nodes by using the grayscale ultrasound criteria of Roundness Index i.e. the ratio of longest diameter of the node to the shortest perpendicular diameter (RI). Nodes having RI 2 were considered as benign. This ultrasound diagnosis was verified with findings of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) which was considered as gold standard for this study.
Results: In total, out of the 305 patients the RI was less than two in 60 patients (19.67%) and was more than two in 245 patients (80.33%). Out of the total 244 patients with benign (80.00%) nodes, 237 (97.13%) had the index more than two. Out of the total 61(20%) patients with malignant nodes, 53 patients (86.88%) had the index less than two.
Conclusions: The grey scale criterion of RI was 86.89% sensitive and 97.13% specific in differentiating between benign and malignant causes of lymph node enlargement. Our results indicate that RI can be utilized for early diagnosis and follow up of cases presenting with suspected neck nodes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Koischwitz D, and Gritzmann D. (2000). “Ultrasound of the Neck”, Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol.38, pp.1029-1045.
Saleh A. (2001). “Cervical Lymph Nodes”, A Teaching Manual of Color Doppler Sonography, Thieme,Vol.01, pp.26-27.
Ariji Y, Kimura Y, Hayashi N, Onitsuka T, Yonetsu K, Hayashi K, Ariji E, Kobayashi T and Nakamura T. (1998). “Power Doppler Sonography of Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer”, American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol.19, pp.303–307.
Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SY, Antonio G, Lee YP, King AD, and Wong KT. (2008). “Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes”, Cancer Imaging, Mar 25, Vol.8, pp.48-56.
Bruneton JN, Rux P, and Caramella E et al. (1984). “Ear, Nose and Throat Cancer: Ultrasound Diagnosis of Metastasis to Cervical Lymph Nodes”, Radiology, Vol.152, pp.771-773.
Ahuja AT, and Ying M. (2005). “Sonographic Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes”, American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol.184, pp.1691-1699.
Chang DB, Yuan A, and Yu CJ et al. (1993). “Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes with Color Doppler Sonography”, Americian Journal of Radiology, Vol.162, pp.965-968.
Solbiati L, Cioffi V, and Ballarati E. (1992). “Ultrasonography of the Neck”, Radiological clinics of North America, Vol.30, pp.941-953.
Arey LB. (1974). “Human Histology”, The Lymph Nodes, Vol.41, pp.148-151.
Ahuja A, Ying M, and King W et al., (1997). “A practical approach to ultrasound of cervical lymph nodes”, Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol.III, pp.245-256.
Wu Chang, and Hsu et al., (1998). “Usefulness of Doppler Spectral Analysis and Power Doppler Sonography in the differentiation of cervical Lymphadenopathies”, American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol.171, pp.503-509.
Dragoni F, Cartoni B, and Pescarmona M. (1999). “The role of High Resolution Pulsed and Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Lymphadenopatrhy”, Cancer, Vol.85, pp.2485 -2490.
Rosário PWS, Faria S, Bicalho L, Alves MFG, Borges MAR, Purisch S, Padrão EL, Rezende LL and Barroso AL. (2005). “Ultrasonographic Differentiation Between Metastatic and Benign Lymph Nodes in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma”, Journal of Ultrasound Medicine, Vol.24, pp.1385-1389.
Nakamura T, and Sumi M. (2007). “Nodal imaging in the neck: recent advances in US, CT and MR imaging of metastatic nodes”, Eur Radiol., May, Vol.17(5), pp.1235-1241.
Gor DM, Langer JE, and Loevner LA. (2006). “Imaging of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: the basics”, Radiol Clin North Am., Jan, Vol.44(1), pp.101-110.
Kuna SK, Bracic I, Tesic V, Kuna K, Herceg GH and Dodig D. (2006). “Ultrasonographic Differentiation of Benign From Malignant Neck Lymphadenopathy in Thyroid Cancer”, by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, J Ultrasound Med, Vol.25, pp.1531-1537.
Gritzmann N, Hollerweger A, and Macheiner P et al. (2002). “Sonography of Soft Tissue Masses of the Neck”, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, Vol.30, pp.356-373.
Som P, and Brandwein M. (2003). “Lymph Nodes”, Head and Neck Imaging, Vol.2, pp.1866-1934.
Yoon HC, Chang SK, Han H, Oh SJ, Kim JH , Rho YS, Ahn HY , Kim KH, and Shin YC. (2010). “Small Atypical Cervical Nodes Detected on Sonography in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Probability of Metastasis”, Journal of Ultrasound Medicine, Vol.29, pp.531–537.
Evans RM, Ahuja A, and Meterweli C. (1993). “The Linear Echogenic Hilus in Cervical Lymphadenopathy - A Sign of Benignity or Malignancy”, Clinical Radiology, Vol.47, pp.262-264.
Vassallo P, Wernecke K, and Roos N et al. (1992). “Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Superficial Lymphadenopathy: The Role of High - Resolution US”, Radiology, Vol.183, pp.215-220.
Brekel MW, Stel HV, and Castelijns JA et al. (1990). “Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis. Assessment of Radiologic Criteria”, Radiology, Vol.177, pp.379-384.
Ahuja A, Ying M., and Evans R et al. (1995). “The Application of Ultrasound Criteria for Malignancy in Differentiating Tuberculous Cervical Adenitis from Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma”, Clinical Radiology, Vol.50, pp.391-395.
Na CG, Lim AK, and Byun GS et al. (1997). “Differential diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Usefulness of Color Doppler Sonography”, The American Journal of Radiology, Vol.168, pp.1311-1316.
Ying M, Ahuja AT, and Evans R et al. (1998). “Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Sonographic Differentiation between Tuberculous Nodes and Nodal Metastases from Non-Head and Neck Carcinomas”, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, Vol.8, pp.383-389.
Steinkemp HJ, Cornehl M, and Hosten N et al. (1995). “Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long-to-short axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy”, The British Journal of Radiology, Vol.68, pp.266-270.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Send mail to ijmpr@ijmpr.com with questions or comments about this web site.
International Journal of Medical and Pharma Research, All rights reserved.