A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROLE OF TABULARIZED INCISED PLATE URETHROPLASTY IN SINGLE AND TWO STAGE REPAIR OF MIDPENILE HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR

Rizwan Ahmad Khan, Imran Ghani

Abstract


Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in single and two stage repair of midpenile hypospadias.

Materials and methods: Twenty seven children of mid penile hypospadias with mild chordee were included in the study.  The patients were divided in two groups (single stage and two stages) and the data was analyzed vis-à-vis stage, complications and outcome.

Results: There were 12 children in single stage group (group A) and 15 patients in two stage groups (group B). Both the groups were comparable with respect to age. The rate of urethrocutaneous fistula in both the groups was equal (33.3%). There was higher rate of meatal stenosis and meatal retraction in group A children as compared to group B. However the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty gives equally good results in single and two stage repair of midpenile hypospadias.

Keywords


Midpenile hypospadias, Chordee, Tubularized urethroplasty, Urethrocutaneous fistula, Meatal stenosis, Meatal retraction.

References


Baccala Jr AA, Ross J, Detore N, and Kay R. (2005). “Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplasty procedure (Snodgrass) for hypospadias repair”, J Urology, Vol.66(6), pp. 1305-1306.

Cakan M, Yalcinkaya F, and Demirel F. (2005). “The midtermsucces rates of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in reoperative patients with distal or midpenile hypospadias”, Pediatr Surg Int, Vol.21(12), pp.973-976.

Chen SC, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, and Chen YT. (2000). “Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias”, BJU Int, Vol.86(9), pp.1050-1053, available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11119100

Cook A, Khoury AE, Neville C, Bagli DJ, Farhat WA, and Pippi Salle JL. (2005). “A multicenter evaluation of technical preferences for primary hypospadias repair”, J Urol, Vol.174, pp.2354-2357.

El-Kassaby AW, Al-Kandari AM, El-Zayat T, and Shokeir AA. (2008). “Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: a long-term results of 764 patients”, J Urol, Vol.71(4), pp.611-615.

El-Sherbiny MT, Hafez AT, and Dawaba MS. (2004). “Comprehensive analysis of tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty in primary and re-operative hypospadias”, BJU Int, Vol.93(7), pp.1057-1061.

Jayanthi VR. (2003). “The modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair: reducing the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis”, J Urol, Vol.170, pp.1603-1605.

Johnson D, and Coleman DJ. (1998). “The selective use of a single stage and a two stage technique for hypospadias correction in 157 consecutive cases with aim of normal appearance and function”, Br J Plast Surg, Vol.51, pp.195 201.

Oswald J, Korner I, and Riccabona M. (2000). “Comparison of the perimeatal-based flap (Mathieu) and the tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty (Snodgrass) in primary distal hypospadias”, BJU Int, Vol.85(6), pp.725-727.

Samuel M, and Wilcox DT. (2003). “Tubularized incised- plate urethroplasty for distal and proximal hypospadias”, BJU Int, Vol.92, pp.783-785.

Snodgrass W, Villanueva C, and Bush N. (2014). “Primary and reoperative hypospadias repair in adults—are results different than in children?”, J Urol, Vol.192(6), pp.1730-1733.

Snodgrass WT, and Lorenzo A. (2002). “Tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias”, BJU Int, Vol.89(1), pp.90-93.

Zhou Y, Lu J, and Takarashi G. (2002). “Snodgrass procedure for primary hypospadius repair”, J Urol, Vol.9, pp.215-218.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Send mail to ijsss@ijsss.com with questions or comments about this web site. 

International Journal of Surgery and Surgical Sciences, All rights reserved.