

AN AUDIT OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIA
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) has become a preferred modality for the treatment of small urinary tract stone.
Aim: to analyse the outcome of ESWL and evaluate its benefits on the treatment of stone disease in a tertiary care center of central India.
Material and Methods: This is a prospective study done in Chirayu Medical College hospital Bhopal in 105 patients from Jan 2011 to Jan 2015. ESWL was performed with STORZ SLX- F2 machine. The number of shocks administered, and the degree of energy were supervised.
Results: In our series amongst 105 patients, 70 patients were having renal stones. Solitary renal stone was most common type seen in our series. Overall Success rate in our study was 95%.Minimum shockwaves were needed for renal and upper ureteric stones and maximum was needed for bladder stone. High success rate with ESWL (97.14%) was seen with renal stones. There were no cases of post ESWL with acute or chronic renal failure, hypertension or residual calculi.
Conclusion: ESWL has become the preferred tool in the Urologist’s armamentarium for treatment of urinary calculi in appropriate cases because it is minimally invasive.Keywords
References
Bon D, Dore B, and Irani J, et al. (1996). “Radiographic prog¬nostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy”, Urology, Vol.48, pp.556-560.
Chaussy C, Brendal W, and Schmiedt E. (1980). “Extracoropereally induced destruction of kidney stones by Shockwaves”, Lancet, Vol.2(12), pp.65-68.s
Federle MP, McAninch JW, Kaiser JA, Good¬man PC, Roberts J, and Mall JC. (1981). “CT of urinary calculi”, AJR Am J Roentgenol, Vol.136, pp.255-258.
Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mandal P, Sankhwar SN, and Sharma SK. (2002). “Computerized tomography attenua¬tion value of renal calculus: can it predict suc¬cessful fragmentation of the calculus by extra¬corporeal shockwave lithotripsy? A preliminary study”, J Urol, Vol.167, pp.1968-1971.
Lingeman EJ, Lifshitz DA, and Evan AP. (2002). “Surgical management of urinary lithiasis”, In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, and Wein AJ. (eds). “Campbell’s Urology”, 8th edition, Saunders, Philadelphia, pp.3361-3451.
Madbouly K, El-Tiraifi AM, Seida M, El-Faqih SR, Atassi R, and Talic RF. (2005). “Slow versus fast wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study”, J Urol, Vol.173, pp.127-130.
Myers DA, Mobley TB, Jenkins JM, Grine WB, and Jordan WR. (1995). “Pediatric low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar”, Journal of Urology, Vol.153(2), pp.453-457.
Nijman RJM, Ackaert K, Scholtmeijer RJ, Lock TWTM, and Schroder FH. (1989). “Long-term results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children”, Journal of Urology, Vol.142(2), pp.609-611.
Parienty RA, Ducellier R, Pradel J, Lubrano JM, Coquille F, and Richard F. (1982). “Diagnostic value of CT numbers in pelvicalyceal filling defects”, Radiology, Vol.145, pp.743-747.
Ruckdeschel M, Bauer E, Schneider W, and Altwein JE. (1992). “ESWL of stones in the mid-ureter”, Urol Int, Vol.49(3), pp.167-170.
Shameem IA, Islam K, Islam AKMA, Salam MA, and Wahab MA. (2001). “Management of ureteral stones by in situ ESWL”, Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol.4, pp.14-15.
Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, and de la Rosette J. (2006). “Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy 25 Years Later: Complications and Their Prevention”, European Urology, Vol.50, pp.981-990.
Thornhill JA, Moran K, Mooney EE, Sheehan S, Smith JM, and Fitzpatrick JM. (1990). “Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for paediatric urinary tract calculi”, British Journal of Urology, Vol.65(6), pp.638-640.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Send mail to ijsss@ijsss.com with questions or comments about this web site.
International Journal of Surgery and Surgical Sciences, All rights reserved.